M.Sc. Tim Weiler

2024

• ---

  Bittenbinder, S., Weiler, T., Paluch, R., Kirschsieper, D., Specovius, O. & Müller, C. (2024)Research Buddy—From a Framework for Overcoming Language Barriers to the Development of a Qualitative Citizen Science Platform

  IN Interacting with Computers 2024, Pages: iwae047 doi:10.1093/iwc/iwae047
  [BibTeX] [Abstract] [Download PDF]

  Abstract Students benefit from international study programmes in fields such as HCI. However, user-centred research in a foreign country has some challenges, especially language hurdles when going into the field and conducting ethnographic and participatory studies. A particular obstacle is added when targeting groups that do not speak English, such as in Germany, where English was not taught in schools until the 1970s. The task and challenge of the present project, ‘Research Buddy’, is to bring together young international students and older people as co-researchers in Germany. We describe the participatory development of the concept of a matching platform and its design. In focus groups with older people, university faculty and students, requirements for a collaborative research infrastructure were jointly identified and prototypically implemented. The empirical results focus on the possibilities the platform offers for qualitative citizen science in the field of age tech.

  @article{bittenbinder_research_2024,
  title = {Research {Buddy}—{From} a {Framework} for {Overcoming} {Language} {Barriers} to the {Development} of a {Qualitative} {Citizen} {Science} {Platform}},
  copyright = {https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open\_access/funder\_policies/chorus/standard\_publication\_model},
  issn = {0953-5438, 1873-7951},
  url = {https://academic.oup.com/iwc/advance-article/doi/10.1093/iwc/iwae047/7833587},
  doi = {10.1093/iwc/iwae047},
  abstract = {Abstract
  Students benefit from international study programmes in fields such as HCI. However, user-centred research in a foreign country has some challenges, especially language hurdles when going into the field and conducting ethnographic and participatory studies. A particular obstacle is added when targeting groups that do not speak English, such as in Germany, where English was not taught in schools until the 1970s. The task and challenge of the present project, ‘Research Buddy’, is to bring together young international students and older people as co-researchers in Germany. We describe the participatory development of the concept of a matching platform and its design. In focus groups with older people, university faculty and students, requirements for a collaborative research infrastructure were jointly identified and prototypically implemented. The empirical results focus on the possibilities the platform offers for qualitative citizen science in the field of age tech.},
  language = {en},
  urldate = {2024-10-27},
  journal = {Interacting with Computers 2024},
  author = {Bittenbinder, Sven and Weiler, Tim and Paluch, Richard and Kirschsieper, Dennis and Specovius, Oliver and Müller, Claudia},
  month = oct,
  year = {2024},
  keywords = {italg},
  pages = {iwae047},
  }

• ---

  Weiler, T., Farshchian, B., Bhattacharjee, S., Müller, C. & Hochwarter, S. (2024)Practices of Participation and Co-Creation in Healthcare: Lessons Learned and Advancements of Established Methodologies

  , Publisher: European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET), Pages: 10.48340/ecscw2024_ws05
  [BibTeX] [Abstract] [Download PDF]

  Participatory research in the health sector is fraught with obstacles. In particular, choosing appropriate methods to involve the heterogeneous stakeholders in the health system can be difficult. Not only are time constraints and hierarchies between professional (and non-professional) healthcare actors a challenge, but also dealing with patients who may have different physical and psychological limitations. Accordingly, not all qualitative methods are applicable to all stakeholder groups. Limitations such as speech or visual impairments can make it difficult to participate in focus groups or design workshops. In this workshop we will discuss experiences with participatory methods in the health sector and explore how established methods can be made more inclusive so that they can be adapted to a wide range of stakeholders.

  @inproceedings{weiler_practices_2024,
  title = {Practices of {Participation} and {Co}-{Creation} in {Healthcare}: {Lessons} {Learned} and {Advancements} of {Established} {Methodologies}},
  shorttitle = {Practices of {Participation} and {Co}-{Creation} in {Healthcare}},
  url = {https://dl.eusset.eu/handle/20.500.12015/5137},
  abstract = {Participatory research in the health sector is fraught with obstacles. In particular, choosing appropriate methods to involve the heterogeneous stakeholders in the health system can be difficult. Not only are time constraints and hierarchies between professional (and non-professional) healthcare actors a challenge, but also dealing with patients who may have different physical and psychological limitations. Accordingly, not all qualitative methods are applicable to all stakeholder groups. Limitations such as speech or visual impairments can make it difficult to participate in focus groups or design workshops. In this workshop we will discuss experiences with participatory methods in the health sector and explore how established methods can be made more inclusive so that they can be adapted to a wide range of stakeholders.},
  language = {en},
  urldate = {2024-06-19},
  publisher = {European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET)},
  author = {Weiler, Tim and Farshchian, Babak and Bhattacharjee, Sourav and Müller, Claudia and Hochwarter, Stefan},
  year = {2024},
  keywords = {italg},
  pages = {10.48340/ecscw2024\_ws05},
  }

• ---

  Weiler, T., Müller, C., Struzek, D., Huldtgren, A., Klapperich, H., Grosskopp, S., Fischer, F., Osterheider, A. & Gaertner, W. (2024)2nd International Workshop on Co-Creation of Hybrid Interactive Systems for Healthcare

  , Publisher: Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V., Pages: 10.18420/muc2024
  [BibTeX] [Abstract] [Download PDF]

  Recent advancements in data science and AI-driven healthcare technologies are bringing up novel opportunities for innovations, such as personalized medicine, self-diagnostic tools for everyday use, or hybrid healthcare models. However, the development of these technologies often overlooks the perspectives of patients and their families and socio-cultural surroundings, posing significant social, technological, and ethical challenges related to data bias, empowerment or surveillance, respectively. Bringing together interdisciplinary, interprofessional, and intersectoral collaboration in a systematic way seems to be a crucial element for adressing these issues and ensuring the meaningful integration of sensitive data and AI technologies into patient-centred healthcare arrangements. In this workshop, researchers and practitioners from diverse related disciplines, including HCI, AI, social and cultural sciences, healthcare, gerontology, etc., are invited to share their case studies on innovative health technologies and medical AI. Drawing from contextual best practices, as well as challenges and failures, the workshop organizers aim to collectively devise a systematic approach for co-designing and implementing telemedical innovations in real-world healthcare settings.

  @inproceedings{weiler_2nd_2024,
  title = {2nd {International} {Workshop} on {Co}-{Creation} of {Hybrid} {Interactive} {Systems} for {Healthcare}},
  url = {https://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/44265},
  abstract = {Recent advancements in data science and AI-driven healthcare technologies are bringing up novel opportunities for innovations, such as personalized medicine, self-diagnostic tools for everyday use, or hybrid healthcare models. However, the development of these technologies often overlooks the perspectives of patients and their families and socio-cultural surroundings, posing significant social, technological, and ethical challenges related to data bias, empowerment or surveillance, respectively. Bringing together interdisciplinary, interprofessional, and intersectoral collaboration in a systematic way seems to be a crucial element for adressing these issues and ensuring the meaningful integration of sensitive data and AI technologies into patient-centred healthcare arrangements. In this workshop, researchers and practitioners from diverse related disciplines, including HCI, AI, social and cultural sciences, healthcare, gerontology, etc., are invited to share their case studies on innovative health technologies and medical AI. Drawing from contextual best practices, as well as challenges and failures, the workshop organizers aim to collectively devise a systematic approach for co-designing and implementing telemedical innovations in real-world healthcare settings.},
  language = {en},
  urldate = {2024-09-10},
  publisher = {Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.},
  author = {Weiler, Tim and Müller, Claudia and Struzek, David and Huldtgren, Alina and Klapperich, Holger and Grosskopp, Sabrina and Fischer, Florian and Osterheider, Angela and Gaertner, Wanda},
  year = {2024},
  keywords = {italg},
  pages = {10.18420/muc2024},
  }

• ---

  Weiler, T., Farshchian, B., Bhattacharjee, S., Müller, C., Hochwarter, S., Pipek, V. & Rohde (Eds.), M. (2024)Practices of Participation and Co-Creation in CSCW Healthcare Research

  International Reports on Socio-Informatics (IRSI). University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany, Publisher: IRSI, Pages: 1–44
  [BibTeX] [Download PDF]

  @inproceedings{weiler_practices_2024-1,
  address = {University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany},
  series = {Iss},
  title = {Practices of {Participation} and {Co}-{Creation} in {CSCW} {Healthcare} {Research}},
  volume = {21},
  shorttitle = {Practices of {Participation} and {Co}-{Creation} in {CSCW} {Healthcare} {Research}},
  url = {https://www.iisi.de/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/IRSI_V2102.pdf},
  language = {en},
  booktitle = {International {Reports} on {Socio}-{Informatics} ({IRSI})},
  publisher = {IRSI},
  author = {Weiler, Tim and Farshchian, Babak and Bhattacharjee, Sourav and Müller, Claudia and Hochwarter, Stefan and Pipek, Volkmar and Rohde (Eds.), Markus},
  year = {2024},
  keywords = {italg},
  pages = {1--44},
  }

2023

• ---

  Osterheider, A., Klapperich, H., Stein, E., Weiler, T., Endter, C., Huldtgren, A. & Müller, C. (2023)Conceptualization of the Understanding of Participation and Co-Creation in Interdisciplinary Research Groups developing Digital Health Technology: An Exploratory Study: Conceptualization of the Understanding of Participation and Co-Creation

  Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2023. New York, NY, USA, Publisher: Association for Computing Machinery, Pages: 534–538 doi:10.1145/3603555.3608572
  [BibTeX] [Abstract] [Download PDF]

  The healthcare sector’s digital transformation necessitates the involvement of stakeholders through participation and co-creation processes. This study aims to investigate the understanding and implementation of participation and co-creation in the development of hybrid interaction technologies in healthcare. Eight interdisciplinary research projects were examined through semi-structured group interviews with 49 participants from academia, industry, and the application field. The interviews focused on participants‘ perspectives on project goals, user groups, access to the field, methods of participation and co-creation, and user motivation. The results highlight the diverse understandings of participation and co-creation, with some perceiving them as research-driven and others as already embedded in user-centered design. The projects emphasized user needs but often excluded stakeholders from collaborative decision-making. Challenges in achieving continuous involvement and co-decision were acknowledged. The findings underscore the need for reflexive practice and evaluation of participation and co-creation throughout the development process, as well as further research on participation across projects. By addressing these challenges and embracing participatory approaches, digital health applications can better address ethical concerns, build trust, and increase acceptance and adoption in the healthcare sector.

  @inproceedings{osterheider_conceptualization_2023,
  address = {New York, NY, USA},
  series = {{MuC} '23},
  title = {Conceptualization of the {Understanding} of {Participation} and {Co}-{Creation} in {Interdisciplinary} {Research} {Groups} developing {Digital} {Health} {Technology}: {An} {Exploratory} {Study}: {Conceptualization} of the {Understanding} of {Participation} and {Co}-{Creation}},
  isbn = {9798400707711},
  shorttitle = {Conceptualization of the {Understanding} of {Participation} and {Co}-{Creation} in {Interdisciplinary} {Research} {Groups} developing {Digital} {Health} {Technology}},
  url = {https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3603555.3608572},
  doi = {10.1145/3603555.3608572},
  abstract = {The healthcare sector's digital transformation necessitates the involvement of stakeholders through participation and co-creation processes. This study aims to investigate the understanding and implementation of participation and co-creation in the development of hybrid interaction technologies in healthcare. Eight interdisciplinary research projects were examined through semi-structured group interviews with 49 participants from academia, industry, and the application field. The interviews focused on participants' perspectives on project goals, user groups, access to the field, methods of participation and co-creation, and user motivation. The results highlight the diverse understandings of participation and co-creation, with some perceiving them as research-driven and others as already embedded in user-centered design. The projects emphasized user needs but often excluded stakeholders from collaborative decision-making. Challenges in achieving continuous involvement and co-decision were acknowledged. The findings underscore the need for reflexive practice and evaluation of participation and co-creation throughout the development process, as well as further research on participation across projects. By addressing these challenges and embracing participatory approaches, digital health applications can better address ethical concerns, build trust, and increase acceptance and adoption in the healthcare sector.},
  urldate = {2023-09-06},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of {Mensch} und {Computer} 2023},
  publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},
  author = {Osterheider, Angela and Klapperich, Holger and Stein, Elisabeth and Weiler, Tim and Endter, Cordula and Huldtgren, Alina and Müller, Claudia},
  month = sep,
  year = {2023},
  keywords = {Co-Creation, Digital Health, Interview, Participation, Qualitative Content Analysis},
  pages = {534--538},
  }

• ---

  Huldtgren, A., Klapperich, H., Weiler, T., Struzek, D., Malmborg, L., Rouncefield, M., Fischer, G. & Müller, C. (2023)First International Workshop on Co-Creation of Hybrid Interactive Systems for Healthcare

  doi:10.18420/MUC2023-MCI-WS06-108
  [BibTeX] [Abstract] [Download PDF]

  The value of hybrid approaches in healthcare has become apparent, in particular, during the recent Covid-19 pandemic, but remains important post-covid, as hybrid modes of operation can mitigate other issues, e.g. remote healthcare delivery, or sustainable healthcare. The advancement of data science and artificial intelligence enables these hybrid modes of healthcare, but also calls for integrated co-creative design approaches that bring together experts in AI, Socio-Informatics, UX and Ethics as well as citizens and practitioners. Despite a long-standing tradition of participatory approaches within HCI, an analysis of the literature shows that a deeper analysis of the practice of inter- and transdisciplinary participatory research in the healthcare field is missing. Furthermore, the aforementioned technological advancements bring new social, technical and ethical issues to the fore, among others questions of data bias, and empowerment of stakeholders. In this workshop we invite researchers and practitioners from diverse backgrounds to share their experiences and (design) case studies in co-creation of hybrid health systems and learn from contextualized best practices and failures. Through building on these experiences and cases and taking inspiration from praxeological research, we would like to collaborate towards a systematic approach for reflection in co-creation of hybrid healthcare systems.

  @article{huldtgren_first_2023,
  title = {First {International} {Workshop} on {Co}-{Creation} of {Hybrid} {Interactive} {Systems} for {Healthcare}},
  url = {https://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/42083},
  doi = {10.18420/MUC2023-MCI-WS06-108},
  abstract = {The value of hybrid approaches in healthcare has become apparent, in particular, during the recent Covid-19 pandemic, but remains important post-covid, as hybrid modes of operation can mitigate other issues, e.g. remote healthcare delivery, or sustainable healthcare. The advancement of data science and artificial intelligence enables these hybrid modes of healthcare, but also calls for integrated co-creative design approaches that bring together experts in AI, Socio-Informatics, UX and Ethics as well as citizens and practitioners. Despite a long-standing tradition of participatory approaches within HCI, an analysis of the literature shows that a deeper analysis of the practice of inter- and transdisciplinary participatory research in the healthcare field is missing. Furthermore, the aforementioned technological advancements bring new social, technical and ethical issues to the fore, among others questions of data bias, and empowerment of stakeholders. In this workshop we invite researchers and practitioners from diverse backgrounds to share their experiences and (design) case studies in co-creation of hybrid health systems and learn from contextualized best practices and failures. Through building on these experiences and cases and taking inspiration from praxeological research, we would like to collaborate towards a systematic approach for reflection in co-creation of hybrid healthcare systems.},
  urldate = {2023-10-03},
  author = {Huldtgren, Alina and Klapperich, Holger and Weiler, Tim and Struzek, David and Malmborg, Lone and Rouncefield, Mark and Fischer, Gerhard and Müller, Claudia},
  year = {2023},
  keywords = {artificial intelligence, Co-Creation, data science, healthcare, Participatory design},
  }

2022

• ---

  Paluch, R., Cerna, K., Volkova, G., Seidler, M., Weiler, T., Obaid, M. & Müller, C. (2022)Robots in heterogeneous contexts: Negotiation of co-creative lifelong learning spaces through participatory approaches

  doi:10.48340/ecscw2022_ws01
  [BibTeX] [Abstract] [Download PDF]

  Learning is inherently social. This raises several questions that relate to how contexts and spaces can mediate co-creative learning. In this workshop proposal, we refer to the interrelated aspects of space, learning, and embodiment and how these aspects mediate the human-robot interaction. Our assumption is that robots are interpreted variously and used in different ways. We are interested in the interrelation between interpretation and use, which are constitutive for the establishment of different co-creative learning spaces. Reflecting on this leads to an understanding of what to look for in Participatory Design studies. It matters, for example, whether persons in a nursing home have any say at all in how robots are perceived and in what technical practices robots are to be integrated and adopted. This is a crucial aspect for the appropriation of technical artifacts and for the development of new (E)CSCW or HCI paradigms.

  @article{paluch_robots_2022,
  title = {Robots in heterogeneous contexts: {Negotiation} of co-creative lifelong learning spaces through participatory approaches},
  issn = {2510-2591},
  shorttitle = {Robots in heterogeneous contexts},
  url = {https://dl.eusset.eu/handle/20.500.12015/4404},
  doi = {10.48340/ecscw2022_ws01},
  abstract = {Learning is inherently social. This raises several questions that relate to how contexts and spaces can mediate co-creative learning. In this workshop proposal, we refer to the interrelated aspects of space, learning, and embodiment and how these aspects mediate the human-robot interaction. Our assumption is that robots are interpreted variously and used in different ways. We are interested in the interrelation between interpretation and use, which are constitutive for the establishment of different co-creative learning spaces. Reflecting on this leads to an understanding of what to look for in Participatory Design studies. It matters, for example, whether persons in a nursing home have any say at all in how robots are perceived and in what technical practices robots are to be integrated and adopted. This is a crucial aspect for the appropriation of technical artifacts and for the development of new (E)CSCW or HCI paradigms.},
  language = {en},
  urldate = {2022-06-27},
  author = {Paluch, Richard and Cerna, Katerina and Volkova, Galina and Seidler, Michael and Weiler, Tim and Obaid, Mohammad and Müller, Claudia},
  year = {2022},
  note = {Accepted: 2022-06-22T04:34:50Z
  Publisher: European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET)},
  }